Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Cloud Storage Types

Persistent Storage sounds like a tautology to me. Been used as I am (was?) to Hard Disks, USB keys, DVDs, and all other possible way to store information, it seems that storage is persistent by definition, and only failures, or human errors can cause non-persistent and catastrophic behavior . Well, in IaaS terminology, Storage comes in different flavors and can also be Ephemeral.

Storage Types

Eucalyptus follows the AWS API and with these APIs comes 3 Storage types:
  • Buckets -- objects store implemented by S3 -- (provided by Walrus), 
  • Elastic Block Storage (EBS) Volumes (provided by the Storage Controller),
  • Ephemeral Instance Store  (provided by the Node Controller). 
Our Storage Team, started a wiki to dig into the technical aspect of the different storage types: stay tune on GitHub for more in depth technical dive on how they have been implemented.

Of the above list, two are meant to be persistent (i.e. to persist across instance termination): Volumes and Buckets. Two provides the familiar block interface (i.e. they appear  and are used as Hard Disks): Volumes and Ephemeral. One is designed to be massively scalable: Buckets. And one is meant to be temporary: Ephemeral.

Instances and Storage

Instances by default are sitting on Ephemeral Storage. Uploaded images (EMIs) are the master copies, and all instances will start as a fresh copy of the that very image. All changes made to the instance (e.g. packages installed, configuration, application data) will disappear once the instance terminates. Notice that the termination of an instance can be voluntary (i.e. the Cloud User issue a terminate-instance command) or accidental (e.g. the hardware running the instance fail, or the software within the instance fails badly). This kind of instances are called instance-store instances

Instances can also use Volumes for their root file system: they are aptly called boot from EBS instance. In this case, at instance creation, a Volume is cloned from a specific EMI snapshot. The instance will then have exclusive access to this Volume, throughout its lifetime, allowing for stopping and re-starting without loss of any changes made. The instance can be restarted wherever the Volume is available (i.e. EBS Storage is only available on a cluster basis, or availability zone), and its performance is driven by the Volume performance (e.g. network speed to a SAN, or DAS serviced by the Storage Controller).

The main different in Storage speed between instance-store and boot from EBS,  is a trade between speed of the local disk (in the case of instance-store), and the speed of accessing a SAN (or DAS) across a network. Things gets more complicated when multiple instances competes for shared resource (e.g. common disks on a Node Controller, or network access to the SAN).

Cloud Admin

The Cloud Admin, although not a user of these Storage types, needs to  have a clear deploy plan to provide enough Storage space for each type, limit contention on shared resources, and ensure that the performance and reliability meets the expected levels. An understanding of the specific load, will go a long way to size the cloud properly.

The deployment of Walrus and the Storage Controller, respectively providers of  Buckets and Volumes, is key to ensure the right level of reliable Nines of the Persistent Storage types. Walrus get/put interface, helps to ensure the scalabilty of the service, but a slow host (CPU is needed to decrypt uploaded images, and serve concurrent streams), or limited space (Walrus stores uploaded images and Buckets) can severely crippled the normal functioning of a cloud.  The Storage Controller serve Volumes to a cluster, both for EBS attachment and boot from EBS: under-sizing the network between Storage Controller and Node Controllers,  can slow down to a crawling halt each instance request to disk.

Ephemeral is served by the Node Controller. Sizing the physical storage subsystem for the expected number and type of instances is needed to ensure the full load can be achieved. Also, with the current multi-cores CPUs, quite a few instances can run on the same Node Controller. Too many concurrent disk requests can easily overwhelm the Node Controller's host, causing instances to time out, or unpredictable and erratic behavior: the storage subsystem needs to be properly tested for the expected concurrent load.

Cloud Application Architect

The Application Architect is reasonably isolated from the underlying hardware used to build the private cloud, insofar as the Cloud Admin has planned properly the Storage Types availability, performances and reliability. Thus the main decisions for the Architect is which Storage Type to use and when. 

Persistent vs Ephemeral 

When I started to drink champagne, I went for what I was accustomed to, that is, very well know servers, well taken care of (ie very persistent). In short an environment where a server rebuild is an exceptional case. The ancient version of Eucalyptus we used then, didn't have boot from EBS, so we effectively implemented it using Volumes and chroot environment. As a bonus, backups were as easy as to create a Snapshot (euca-create-snapshot).

After few cloud moves and upgrades (both of software and hardware), I started to embrace the idea of the chaos monkey, where no single instance is central to the service. Now I'm relying more and more on scripts to configure defaults images on the fly, and on Buckets to store the backups needed to recover the last good state. In the case of essential database I would still use a combination of Volumes and Bucket for availability and backups.

I think my experience is common, and  I see how administrators coming from datacenter tend to start with the Storage is Persistent idea, looking for the comfort of boot from EBS. Administrators coming from the public cloud, are already familiar with the dynamic approach of the cloud, and are more comfortable with the idea that some Storage is Ephemeral, and plan accordingly for instances to be disposable

Edited December 10, 2012
Added links for the various storage types definitions, and made it clear that S3 provides Buckets. Added Cloud Storage Types properties picture.


  1. Thanks for sharing such valuable information related with Cloud Storage types. Cloud Storage is one of the most growing technology that enables us to store and share data virtually.
    Best Cloud Storage Providers

  2. Thanks for sharing such useful information about cloud storage types. The information provided is very very niche and this information is not available so easily. Therefore I thank the writer for the useful input.

  3. Thank you so much for sharing this cloud storage types. It is very important to us because we need to kept our important things or files.. Keep on sharing!

    Learn more about Storage Get Information Here

  4. Thank you so much for sharing this remarkable blog post, Graziano! Knowing the different types of cloud storage will be a big help for someone whose work requires a computer and an internet connection. This is very enlightening for users will have a wide range to choose. They can now immediately access their files via a web service interface.